For the record, I watched this film a while back, but I just ran across what I wrote about it, which is very appropriate to post here:
Although I admire highly philosophical films, and have a certain love for movies searching for the Truth, (much like the love an engineer has when testing out their world-changing creation for the first time, knowing it will either fail miserably or save the world, but they will still love it all the same), I still have to admit that I really didn’t like this film. Instead it serves as a reminder as to why most people don’t usually make films concerning the Truth, because usually they fail. Simply finding a single truth (lower-case ‘t’), while equally challenging, seems to have a much higher success rate. The first word that came to mind after watching the final credit fall away was “terrible,” but I have to admit that is a little unfair. It’s no Cars That Ate Paris or Sweet Home Alabama or Pearl Harbor, but being better than those films still does not make it good. So more fairly I would have to say it is just “pretty bad.”
Typically reviews (at least most good reviews) attempt to give some justification for their judgment. Aside from the obvious nitpicking with the filmmaking technique, which isn’t good, but still secondary to the real meaning of this film, my larger discomfort lies with the philosophical conclusions being made. For those looking to make a beginning critique of this film: Why were all the people interviewed white males, with the exception of an Indian man and a woman who was really only the medium for a person named Ramtha? Why was there never any mention of culture, and how that affects our brains and/or social order? And to what extent can you take seriously such an openly biased and one-sided presentation of a contentious field of knowledge? And what’s with all the really bad musical cues?
Without writing out a lengthy rebuttal of my own, because I rest assured other people have already made their own, I’ll simply mention some of the more blatantly questionable claims made within the film. Yes, I still have serious doubts that there exists a picture of the same particle IN TWO PLACES! I also seriously wonder about the scientific merit of an enlarged photo of a water molecule supposedly altered due to its proximity to a piece of Japanese writing. I also simply refuse to believe that Native Americans couldn’t see approaching ships until a mystical shaman tapped them on the forehead.
In the end, I would give a conservative estimate that at least 60% of this film is hooey, and that doesn’t bode well for its overall effectiveness. I am more than willing to accept a little hooey in my films, but when the hooey / quality ratio is that high, it becomes increasingly difficult. But please don’t feel obliged to take my word for it. For those who have read this far, I would like to add this story:
I have a friend, an extremely dear and important friend who was extremely influential on me in my younger, developing years. He was absolutely fascinated with quantum physics. When we went to bookstores, he would head to the science section and sit and read the books there for hours (he was too cheap to buy them). I mean literally hours, inside a busy bookshop, working intently on this text. As we grew older, he began to get increasingly odd. Whether this was due to his abusive father, his love for the Cure, or his obsession with quantum physics, we will never know. What I do know is that after a lengthy gap in our relationship, I ran across him again at a party at my brother’s house. He told me that the last time we were in contact he was going through some very serious psychic trauma. He was constantly being dumped by an imaginary girlfriend, among other things. Unfortunately this imaginary girlfriend was all too real for him. Eventually he attempted suicide which led to his psychiatric care, after which he was diagnosed as a schizophrenic, manic depressive. This did some to explain his inexplicable behavior at the time when we originally lost touch. He seemed very happy to see me, and very eager to hold on to our relationship. He seemed to intimate that this might have something to do with helping him not slip back into some of his old psychic pitfalls. Reconnecting with me would be a way for him to help remember past, present, and future, and keep them sorted out.
What the above story has to do with quantum physics and What the BLEEP Do We Know is uncertain, except to say that I will continue to remain highly skeptical of the philosophy contained within that film.